The Bitcoin Conspiracy: Professor Jiang's Views on a New World Order

In recent discussions, Professor Jiang Xueqin, a Beijing-based speaker who identifies as a "predictive historian," is reinterpreting Bitcoin as a tool for U.S. imperialism and a key component in the emerging global order. His bold assertions merge geopolitical analysis with conspiracy theories.

Key Takeaways

Jiang's Perspective: He frames Bitcoin as a product of U.S. imperial interests, suggesting that it serves as a surveillance tool rather than being the innovation of an individual.
Monetary Transition: Jiang believes that the current economic shifts signal the decline of U.S. power and will establish Bitcoin in a "structurally different regime."
Bitcoin and War: The cryptocurrency is seen as a barometer of geopolitical conflict, with recent trading behaviors indicating a direct link between Bitcoin prices and occurrences of military action.

Professor Jiang Bitcoin conspiracy about war and surveillance

Jiang's Interpretations of Bitcoin's Role

Jiang Xueqin, known for forecasting significant political events such as Donald Trump’s return to power and potential U.S.–Iran hostilities, is now presenting Bitcoin as a pivotal element of what he sees as the U.S. empire nearing its end. In his lectures, shared widely on platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and X, he argues that we are observing the conclusion of "U.S. imperial overextension," signaling that Bitcoin's future will reflect a fundamental rather than cyclical market change. He describes his approach as "predictive history," integrating ideas from geopolitics and game theory to evaluate models against real-world events.

In his analysis, he claims Bitcoin is not simply the work of an unknown individual, but rather a Pentagon initiative designed to function as "the ultimate surveillance technology." This echoes a popular conspiracy belief that associates Bitcoin’s creation with the CIA. Jiang postulates that Satoshi Nakamoto’s anonymity is deserving of scrutiny, reasoning that only an agency-backed group could have developed a comprehensive global monetary framework due to the necessary resources and expertise. Additionally, he highlights that the inherent transparency of Bitcoin allows law enforcement to track illicit fund flows more effectively than cash transactions.

Linking Bitcoin to Geopolitical Change

Jiang connects U.S. military actions in the Persian Gulf to broader economic trends. He argues that failures in military engagements erode the dollar’s strength, pushing capital towards hard assets and driving Bitcoin’s value upwards as demand rises. A popular YouTube analysis influenced by his views describes Bitcoin as the "most liquidity-sensitive asset" worldwide and emphasizes how every dollar lost in conflict costs might ultimately channel into Bitcoin due to its limited supply of 21 million coins. In this light, Jiang's approach suggests that Bitcoin's value is influenced more by the financial responses to U.S. imperialism rather than traditional market cycles.

This perspective has gained traction among traders, who increasingly view Bitcoin as a reflection of geopolitical tensions. Reports have noted that cryptocurrency markets are responding promptly to ongoing military conflicts, particularly in Iran, with Bitcoin’s price fluctuating between the mid-$60,000 to low-$70,000 range. Analysts have projected potential price increases up to $73,000–$79,000 while acknowledging current market volatility.

Jiang's Rise and Criticism

The popularity of Jiang's ideas seems to have surged, particularly after his predictions regarding Trump's election and subsequent conflicts have resonated with the trading community. His YouTube channel, Predictive History, primarily features his unedited classroom sessions where he discusses major power dynamics and "changes in world order" with high school students in Beijing. However, his methodology has faced pushback, with critics claiming he tends to replace factual evidence with sweeping narratives. Archaeologist Flint Dibble recently criticized Jiang, describing him as "a wacko who spreads harmful conspiracy theories," asserting that his predictions are frequently inaccurate.

The same conflicting views are evident in Jiang's stances on Bitcoin. Although his analysis recognizes that certain historical facts hold water—like DARPA's role in early internet development and Bitcoin's potential utility for law enforcement—he struggles to substantiate claims linking Bitcoin's origins directly to U.S. intelligence agencies. Thus, his narrative weaves cryptocurrency into a larger story of declining American dominance and the emergence of a multipolar world, influencing how a growing number of retail investors interpret market movements in Bitcoin, regardless of whether his theories ultimately withstand scrutiny.