The Future of Stablecoins: Path to Mainstream Adoption

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author alone and do not reflect the opinions of crypto.news' editorial team.

Key Takeaways

The GENIUS Act is a positive step towards increased crypto adoption, particularly for stablecoins.
Issues such as lack of transparency and regulatory oversight have hindered the design of some stablecoins.
Moving forward, stablecoins need to embrace compliance and user convenience without sacrificing ease of use.
Trust and security are crucial for the mainstream acceptance of stablecoins, highlighting the need for improved verification methods.
Implementing zero-knowledge proofs can enhance privacy while ensuring compliance.

Stablecoins can — and will — go mainstream | Opinion

The recent signing of the GENIUS Act signals a promising future for cryptocurrency adoption, especially for stablecoins. These tokens, which are pegged to traditional assets, offer security and stability to users—making them appealing to newcomers in the blockchain space. However, there are significant challenges that need addressing for stablecoins to thrive in mainstream finance.

The Path Forward for Stablecoins

The recent enactment of the GENIUS Act suggests that cryptocurrency adoption is on the rise, with stablecoins at the forefront of this transformation. By being tied to traditional assets, stablecoins offer reassurance to users, particularly those who might be apprehensive about engaging with the web3 ecosystem. Nonetheless, numerous challenges require attention for these digital assets to succeed.

For over ten years, the vision of digital currencies has focused on achieving mainstream acceptance in everyday life. This goal faces obstacles, including the need for solid legislation and engagement from those outside the crypto community. Fortunately, there are encouraging signs of progress in both areas. Legislative measures are evolving positively, and there is a 33% growth in cryptocurrency ownership, indicating increased interest in stablecoins.

However, not every shift in the stablecoin landscape has been favorable. The collapse of TerraUSD (UST) in 2022 exposed critical weaknesses in stablecoin design. Problems such as insufficient transparency regarding reserves, excessive reliance on smart contracts lacking safety mechanisms, and inadequate regulatory oversight illustrate the challenges facing stablecoins.

The industry's response to these vulnerabilities has often been superficial. Many stablecoins operate on general-purpose blockchains that are not tailored for regulated finance. Without a compliance-oriented approach, achieving mainstream acceptance will be difficult.

It's important to note that stablecoins are not all alike. Once seen as niche components of a disruptive financial landscape, they are now poised to enter larger financial markets. As these tokens integrate into everyday consumer markets, they must prioritize compliance, particularly concerning privacy aspects.

At the same time, enhancing compliance should not compromise user experience. Although many individuals are starting to embrace stablecoins, the concept remains unfamiliar to many others. Skeptics of cryptocurrency will require both usability and regulatory assurance.

While stablecoins show potential for everyday transactions, their market appeal is broader. With strong, infrastructure-backed solutions, stablecoins have an opportunity to evolve into diverse, flexible financial instruments.

To date, smart contracts were touted as foundational tools for trust and automation in stablecoins. Unfortunately, they have not always lived up to expectations. Their lack of oversight has contributed to numerous security breaches, resulting in significant financial losses—evident from incidents like the DAO hack in 2016 and other recent breaches. The inherent vulnerabilities in smart contracts underscore the need for a stronger security framework.

For stablecoins to cement their place in mainstream finance, they must transcend mere code and foster a deeper foundation of trust. However, the notion of trust in digital assets cannot be universally defined—it varies by country and even by context within individual businesses.

To build trust effectively, stablecoins must be adaptable. Instead of relying solely on smart contracts for governance, the tokens themselves should be empowered to meet compliance obligations. By embedding adaptable token standards directly onto the blockchain, stablecoins can be aligned with various legislative and transactional requirements.

These "Smartcoins" can adjust to accommodate the legal demands and expectations of various transactions, broadening their potential use cases. Additionally, creating stablecoins at the blockchain level eliminates unnecessary complexities associated with smart contracts, consequently reducing security risks.

To achieve mainstream adoption, the industry also urgently needs robust identification verification processes. Currently, there exists a disconnect between the necessity for ID in specific transactions and the importance of protecting buyers' private data. Traditional verification methods, such as ID uploads or facial recognition, are often inadequate. Instead, transactions involving stablecoins should uphold privacy while still providing necessary verification to all parties involved.

Specifically, leveraging zero-knowledge proofs can enable the validation of necessary information without exposing sensitive details. For example, when purchasing alcohol, a zero-knowledge proof can confirm that the buyer is of legal age without revealing any personal identifiers. This ensures compliance while maintaining buyer privacy.

The rapid growth of stablecoins is clear, but their operational effectiveness will depend on their versatility and ability to enhance security. The industry must shift away from outdated techniques in favor of innovative solutions that will aid widespread adoption. Only through these improvements can stablecoins truly enter the mainstream financial arena.

Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki is the CEO of Concordium, an L1 blockchain technology firm. Previously, he served as Chief Commercial Officer for Copper.co and as Senior Relationship Manager at Newscape Capital Group in London. He is a graduate of the University of St. Gallen and holds an MBA from IMADEC University.