The Rise of Autonomous Applications: Moving Beyond Decentralization Theater

Disclosure: The opinions and views expressed in this article belong solely to the author and do not represent the official stance of crypto.news.

Key Takeaways

The ByBit hack in February 2025 revealed vulnerabilities in supposedly decentralized systems.
Vitalik Buterin emphasized that genuine decentralization must not compromise open access, security, privacy, or censorship resistance.
Many current DeFi platforms demonstrate "decentralization theater," where centralized infrastructure remains crucial, despite the facade of autonomy.
Autonomous smart contracts could eliminate the need for external triggers and reduce dependency on centralized components.
Projects like Massa blockchain are pioneering new ways to implement on-chain execution, enhancing the independence of applications.
The industry's future lies in creating genuinely automated applications that uphold blockchain’s foundational ideals without relying on traditional intermediaries.

Autonomous apps end the era of decentralization theater | Opinion

In the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency, the concept of decentralized applications is under scrutiny. Notably, despite advancements in blockchain technology, many decentralized finance (DeFi) systems still rely on centralized components, undermining the principles of decentralization. A push for truly autonomous applications could redefine how these systems operate and provide genuine decentralized solutions.

The Current State of DeFi: A Performance of Illusion

In February 2025, a significant breach at ByBit highlighted critical weaknesses in the crypto world, as attackers exploited vulnerabilities in Ledger devices and injected malicious code into Safe {Wallet}. This incident drained millions from unsuspecting users, underscoring that even the most reliable tools can hide dangerous centralized choke points.

By July, Vitalik Buterin addressed the need for true decentralization during a speech in Cannes, reinforcing that systems must remain open, secure, private, and censorship-resistant; sacrificing these principles for growth leads to losing the essence of web3.

Much of today’s DeFi landscape resembles a performance, where impressive smart contracts take center stage while centralized infrastructure operates behind the scenes. This results in a "decentralization theater," providing an alluring illusion but still heavily dependent on centralized systems.

While trading on platforms like Uniswap or borrowing via Aave, it is crucial to recognize that beneath the polished interface lies a complex web of centralized dependencies that could put traditional banking structures to shame.

The Fragility of Current Systems

Services like Chainlink Automation and Gelato Network play the role of "keepers," managing contracts off-chain to initiate transactions. These systems automate processes such as liquidations and rebalancing but introduce critical centralized points of failure. This becomes evident when examining the dependencies on AWS for front-end hosting, admin keys, and oracle services.

For example, Compound's liquidation mechanism relies on external bots activated by profit-driven actors. Rather than being decentralized, this gives the impression of centralization with additional layers of complexity.

MakerDAO’s reliance on oracle networks for price feeds and Yearn Finance’s need for constant, centralized oversight to manage strategies all illustrate that, despite aspirations for autonomy, today's DeFi often requires a robust infrastructure of trusted intermediaries to function.

The core issue lies in the nature of smart contracts, which are essentially advanced databases dependent on external instructions to operate. This reactive nature creates various dependencies—like scheduling systems based on time, price feeds reliant on oracles, and frontend updates necessitating centralized control—leading to a convoluted patchwork of off-chain services masquerading as decentralized systems.

During the collapse of Terra Luna in 2022, it became evident that the failure wasn’t just limited to the stablecoin but also included smart contracts that were dependent on one another—a rigid system waiting for an external "pull" to function.

The Path to True Autonomy

As Vitalik Buterin emphasized, effective decentralization must move beyond mere elimination of trusted intermediaries; it should also focus on exercising power reliably and fairly. Today’s DeFi models often fail to meet these criteria due to their reliance on back-end components.

Emerging layer-1 designs, like Massa blockchain, are addressing this dilemma by enabling on-chain execution scheduling. Imagine a fully automated lending protocol that independently liquidates positions, or a decentralized exchange that rebalances liquidity without the need for keeper networks. These concepts are not far-fetched dreams; they represent the next logical step in blockchain evolution.

Autonomous smart contracts hold the key to this transformation, allowing applications to self-initiate actions based on predetermined conditions without waiting for external triggers. The development of on-chain scheduling systems and modular automation frameworks signals a shift toward apps that are proactive rather than reactive.

Projects like Massa blockchain and others are championing this vision, embedding autonomy directly into the smart contract layer. By using on-chain schedulers that activate contract execution based on time intervals, price thresholds, or market changes, we can diminish opportunities for malicious practices such as miner extractable value (MEV) while facilitating truly trustless applications functioning around the clock without manual oversight.

This transformation—from dependent systems to autonomous applications—marks a pivotal maturation phase in the blockchain space, evolving from programmable monetary systems to fully programmable economic ecosystems.

The Implications of Autonomy

Emphasizing autonomy brings several benefits: reduced counterparty risk for users, the removal of MEV bots, and lower transaction fees by doing away with keeper intermediaries. Developers stand to gain from simplified architectures, reduced operational overhead, and enhanced security from fewer vulnerabilities.

For the broader ecosystem, autonomous applications promise genuine decentralization and credible neutrality, showcasing systems designed not to discriminate. They fortify blockchain’s programmability while eliminating the need for trusted intermediaries.

The distinction between dependent and autonomous applications resembles the contrast between centralized and decentralized systems, where one relies on continuous human involvement and off-chain infrastructure, while the other functions independently, fulfilling the original promise of trustless operations.

Critics express concerns about potential challenges such as computational demands, design complexities, and software bugs. These discussions are valid and necessary. However, the drawbacks of autonomy are merely growing pains; the repercussions of pseudo-decentralization—like admin keys and centralized oracles—constitute perpetual risks.

Fortunately, blockchain technologies and tools are advancing rapidly, making the inherent trade-offs worthwhile. Most major DeFi exploits stemmed from centralized components, and autonomous systems not only reduce risks but also eliminate whole categories of vulnerabilities by design.

The blockchain industry stands at a crossroads: to either persist in the performance of decentralization theater—where sleek interfaces hide centralized servers—or to build the truly trustless, autonomous applications that blockchain technology was designed to realize.

Conclusion: The Future of Blockchain

The disruption caused by Solana's network outage in 2024 served as a sobering glimpse into the fragility underlying DeFi. As users, developers, and investors, there is a collective responsibility to demand protocols that can operate independently, free from reliance on intermediaries.

As we witness the curtain beginning to fall on the current state of DeFi, let's commit to building genuine systems of autonomy before the next disruption demands our attention once again.

Daniel Morosan, the director of business development at Massa, a fully decentralized layer-1 blockchain, is leading the charge in how web3 applications are conceived and deployed. His work, focused on creating self-reliant DeFi tools that operate entirely on-chain, aims for systems that require no centralized servers or off-chain automation, fostering true independence post-deployment. Daniel also plays a pivotal role in ecosystem expansion and recently initiated a hackathon series with AKINDO, centered around innovative autonomous DeFi solutions.